This story originally started with two guys at a middle school dance recital. I'll let your imagination fill in what could have led up to this.
"Dude, I just can't see how the risk of finding yourself in a situation like this is justified by whatever perceived benefit you gain from doing it."
"Because in doing it I implicitly believe I am capable of ensuring those situations do not occur - and if they do, I believe I am capable of performing satisfactory damage control. Obviously, if I did not believe I was capable, I would not take that risk."
"Clearly, dude, you're incapable, otherwise this would not have happened."
"Just because I failed does not mean I am incapable. Alternatively, if I were incapable before, I might be capable now since I have now experienced the risk. My odds are good."
"Maybe, but you still don't have evidence of your capability, merely postulations of what you think could be likely. You're banking on what you hope you'll do, not what you know you will do."
"The hardest part about doing most things is wanting to do it. There is no point in wanting something you can't reasonably hope to achieve. If we have a chance, then we can hope. The reason we can want something for a long time is hope."
"But dude, hope has to be grounded in reasonable suspicion. It's foolish to hope for something that has no root in truth."
"I think it is reasonable suspicion enough to know that others have succeeded in the same endeavor."
"Just because one person can do it doesn't guarantee that you can. People are really different from one another, having totally different strengths and weaknesses."
"Granted, but you are assuming that those are hard and fast barriers. If we only engaged in activities for which we possessed all the necessary strengths, it is likely that we would do nothing but eat, sleep, and fuck. We are not perfectly equipped for many of the things we do every day, but we still manage."
"I'm not arguing against taking dudely risks - I'm just saying, not everything can be done by everyone. Stephen Hawking is never going to pole-vault. Your mom will never stop being such a whore. It's a fact of their existence that these things simply cannot be."
"And I am not arguing that all things are possible, always. I know that certain things are beyond our ability, and that our abilities can only extend so far in each direction. It is not about achieving exactly what we desire, but about getting something like what we want. No one wants precisely the same car as their neighbor - they want a car that's as good (perhaps better), and preferably different in a way that resonates with their identity. Pole-vaulting is a specific niche in a large variety of activities that all communicate precisely the same message: I am athletic. I am at the peak of my physical capability. I have worked hard to achieve this. All of these are qualities that can be replicated, even if only on a smaller scale. It is not about duplicating, but replicating."
"That just sounds like a convoluted justification for settling. Not that settling is necessarily wrong or bad, but it seems like that logic is primarily focused on justifying the belief that getting halfway is as good as going all the way."
"Only if you shift contexts mid-way through. Remember, we are talking about people with limitations in capability, not desire or dedication. If their limitations are great, but they still manage to achieve something that most others are not capable of, then we must conclude that their desire and dedication are very great. Because of this, we can be justified in respecting their achievement without demeaning the respect we have for quantitatively more impressive feats."
"Still sounds relativistic to me, dude. Can you really say that two quantitatively unequal achievements might demand the same level of respect? Not to make respect sound too one-dimensional, but I'd rather get the autograph from the guy that set the world-record, no qualifiers attached."
"And that is a matter of perspective. What is minimally required, however, is that the lesser achievements are still worthy of respect. Other people with perspectives that enable them to know and understand the unique challenges of the lesser achievement will probably hold higher respect - but that is the nature of all performance. We are always more impressed by our friend that did the backflip than the guy on youtube."
"How is this not relativistic again?"
"It is not relativistic because I am not ignoring the numbers. I am not crossing out the world record and scribbling in the person that tried harder but did not quite make it. The numbers are an important standard for measuring performance and progress. The point is simply that the numbers are not the only way in which success and achievement can be witnessed. How we react as individuals to these achievements is a matter of personal choice. How we respect these achievements as a society is a matter of consensus, and we don't always agree. Which is fine."
"At your own admission, I am able to choose whether or not I respect your failure. I think that's an easy choice."
"And let it be an indicator of my desire and dedication that I do not heed your lack of respect for my course of action, particularly when there exist many important instances where I seek out your approval."
"As recompense, you should give me my hat back, dude."
Stellamara - Prituri Se Planinata (NiT GriT Remix)
- download
- youtube
This is a little more classic me, I guess. No lyrics here, just some sick vwom vwoms and a woman oooaaaing in the background.
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home